Wednesday, January 13, 2010

Swallow the tube

Bottom line: we don't know any more than we did before we did the biopsy, but we have something to test and will know in a week or ten days. (Blessed relief: for ten days I don't have to think about all this stuff. I will, of course, but I don't have to.)

So here is stage two (or three, or four, depending on how you count). After the apprehension and the awkwardness of trying to internalize both the possibility that the adrenal gland is "clean" and the possibility (probability) that it is cancerous, the biopsy took place yesterday, Thursday at El Camino Hospital in Mountain View. They had some emergencies, so the wait was very long: Noon for the preliminary checkin, 2:00 pm for the Endoscopy unit, 3:30 pm for the actual "procedure". The procedure actually took place beginning at 5:00 pm and we did not get out of the hospital until 8:00 pm. "Nothing by mouth after midnight" is the rule so I was dehydrated and beyond hunger. I could not have done this with any equilibrium without the help of a friend who calmly and quietly went through the process with me and waited. That human touch (and the good humor of the nurses and hospital staff) really helped.

Of the "procedure" I remember nothing. They give you a tranquilizer and then something to put you to sleep. The anesthesiologist says he will ask me to count to 10 and then I will be out. I don't remember even counting to ten. The doctor (very good, competent, and gives a lot of information) reported that he could not reach the main mass on the right adrenal because of an intervening blood vessel, but that he was able to take a sample for biopsy from another spot right next to the mass.

I guess that is enough, but now there are three spots and I don't know how they think about this: if the sample is clean, does that mean the other spots are also clean? If it is cancerous, does that mean that the others are also cancerous? And what about new spots they haven't even seen yet?

Two impressions of the hospital: (1) it is so beautiful, quiet, calming; I wonder at the difference between this and the large public hospitals where most people are treated, the amount of money that goes into these buildings and the art that is in them and the names of the (rich?) people who have given money to support the hospital. V says that one massive blown-glass hanging sculpture probably cost $150,000. (2) the whole process is very "industrialized": each step in the process is monitored, requires its own paperwork, and the functions are routinized. There were three people waiting for this procedure when I arrived all waiting in one big room (with curtains between), each one gowned and hooked up to an iv. They guy next to me had colon cancer and the doctor was explaining how it could be treated. Each patient (odd word applied to people in the hospital for health reasons: "patient"; what if they are "impatient"?) is moved and tested and returned to the recovery unit. Felt a little like an auto assembly line.

I don't feel like a "victim" (a "cancer victim" as the term is used) or even as "unhealthy". I am actually pretty healthy, except for this little problem.....Is there a way in which we have created a system that separates the "sick" from the "healthy"? Maybe it is because sickness makes us uncomfortable and speaks to our vulnerability and the certainty of life ending.

p.s. In the first post, I said that my left kidney was taken in 2008; actually it was 1988.
p.p.s. The procedure itself: Turns out, this is a common procedure, a way of getting at organs from the "inside" as it were. You put a flexible tube down the throat and into the stomach and the intestines with a camera and an ultrasound thingy that "maps" organs roughly like sonar. Then they use a needle to go through the wall of the intestine to take a biopsy sample from the tumor on the adrenal gland.

Monday, January 11, 2010

How it begins

Well, really it began about a month ago when I went in for a routine CT scan (part of my regular checkup after having surgery for renal cancer in October of 2008. Without looking at the report from the radiologist, I can't remember the medical terms, but basically they found "spots" on both my left and right adrenal glands. They sit just "on top" of the kidney. I have no kidney on the left side having lost it to cancer in 2008. The kidney on the right has been "resected" and is now about 40% of its normal size. It seems to be working fairly well.

So, in December, they found these two spots, the one on the left being small and the one on the right (the more recent cancer site) being about 3.5 centimeters square - big! The oncologist (Glenn Wong) ordered an MRI and they did that and confirmed the existence of the spots (read "tumors").

On January 4 of this year, they tried to perform ("perform" - seems like a strange word, used medically) a biopsy of the right tumor. They were not able to do the biopsy due to the intervening organs (kidney, liver, etc.). They don't like to put the biopsy needle through other organs. The organs could recover from the "poking" (as the radiologist called the procedure), but there is a greater chance of "seeding" - recovering cancer cells in the target organ and seeding them into other organs when the needle is withdrawn.

After a week of consultation (doctor to doctor; I was not in on it), Glenn called me and said they thought I should have a procedure called endoscopic ultrasound - putting a tube down the throat into the digestive system with an ultrasound thingy on the end and taking measurements of organs. They combine this with "fine needle aspiration", which means putting an needle through the wall of the digestive system into the adrenal gland to obtain tissue for the biopsy.

All this on Thursday, this week at 9:20 am. More than the procedure, which sounds very uncomfortable (Glenn sez the alternative is surgical), is the feeling that having taken this step, I am now on the road to another course of treatment (chemo?) and recovery if that is possible. Having been here twice now (1988-1989 and 2008-2009), my remembrance is that it delays (if I allow it to) my life. And then I remember that this is my life, with its own twists and turns, its own lessons, its on joys and sorrows, and that (really) I (and you) have no alternative but to live it out for as long as it lasts.

That is centering and comforting. I am not a "cancer victim". I am a person living out his life and the things that happen are happening to me in real time. "Dailyness" as they say. I have had cancer, may have cancer again (could be the same cancer; cancer is very crafty), but so long as I am alive, I have the option to live.